Californians Aware
HomeCalAwareSupportProgramsNewsResourcesStore
Mission Text LOGIN +
sunscribe
Info for Citizens
Info for Public Officials
Info for Journalists
Info for Attorneys

Support CalAware Support CalAware Become a Member Volunteer Donate

Brought to you by

Cooper White Cooper

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player


ROBLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
» Legal Compliance Scoring
» Customer Service Scoring
» Auditor Narrative
» CalAware Reaction

Legal Compliance

Deduct the following from 100 points :

Was the requester denied the ability to make the request? No (-0 points)
Explanation: When the agency refuses to receive the request or pass it along to the appropriate party.
Did the agency deny access to any of the Form 700s? Yes (-10 points)
Explanation: When the agency refuses to allow access to any of the completed Form 700s for any reason.
Was photo ID required? No (-0 points)
Explanation: When the agency requires the requester to produce photo ID as a condition of the access.
Was the requester's name required? Yes (-5 points)
Explanation: When the agency requires the requester to provide their name as a condition of the access.  
Was the requester's affiliation required? Yes (-5 points)
Explanation: When the agency requires the requester to provide their affiliation as a condition of the access.
Was the requester required to state their purpose? Yes (-5 points)
Explanation: When the agency requires the requester to explain the reason they are making the request and/or what they will do with the materials produced as a condition of the access.
Was a written request required? No (-0 points)
Explanation:When the agency requires that requests be made in writing (refuse to acknowledge oral requests).
Were the Form 700s produced by the legally compliant deadline (within 48 after making the request)? Never Produced
(-20 points)
Was the requester only allowed to view (not copy) the Form 700s? No (-0 points)
Was the requester charged a fee to view the Form 700s? No (-0 points)
Was the copy fee for the Form 700s within the legally compliant maximum
(10¢ per page)?
Yes (-0 points)
Was the letter of determination received within 10 days (or 24 days, if a 14 day extension was requested)? Never Produced
(-35 points)
Did the agency deny access to any of the items in the written request? (not applicable)
Explanation: The score is reduced by 5 points for each item unjustifiably denied, up to -35 points.  
Total Points Deducted : 80
Final Score : 20
Grade : F

Customer Service

Deduct the following from 100 points :

Was agency staff courteous? Yes (-0 points)
Explanation:When agency staff are polite and professional
Was agency staff helpful? No (-10 points)
Explanation:When agency staff try to help the requester succeed with his or her request.
Was the requester referred to another agency altogether? No (-0 points)
Explanation: When the agency refuses to fulfill the request, and instead sends the requester to another agency.
BONUS! Did the agency have any public records request guidelines (or policy) posted? No (+0 points)
Explanation: When the agency conspicuously posts procedural guidelines in its main lobby area to help the public navigate their agency when making public record requests (worth 10 extra credit points).
Total Points Deducted : 10
Final Score : 90
Grade : A-
Top

Auditor Narrative (auditor Sally King):


Sally King
Robla School District
March 24, 2009

I arrived at the office around 11 a.m. Patty Fagalnifin was sitting at her desk and came to the counter and greeted me. I asked her for the most recently filed statement of economic interests, and told her it was called the 700 form.

Fagalnifin asked why I needed it. I said it was for a project I am working on. She left for a moment and came back with a blank form. I said I needed one that has been filled out. She asked me to wait a moment.

Fagalnifin went to another room and brought back a woman named Susan who explained they had several 700 forms and since they were having their school board meeting this Thursday, the most recent forms would not be ready until Friday. She too asked what I needed the forms for and I explained I was working on a project. She asked me if it was for a class and I said yes.

She asked me to come back Friday for the most recent forms. I then asked for a copy of their records showing the dates of completion for the most recent ethics training. Both women looked baffled, and said they had no idea what I was talking about.

Fagalnifin called someone from her phone and inquired about it. This person also had no idea what I was talking about. I said it is required by AB1234. They still had no idea what ethics-training program I was talking about and had never heard of AB1234.

I called Emily and asked if I should go back and ask for the 700 forms that were already filled out from the previous year and she said yes, please do. I went back and Patty Fagalnifin was still at her desk. I asked her if she could please provide me with the last forms that were filled out showing the statement of economic interests, that it was not necessary to wait to get the newest ones that are coming out on Friday. She said do you want the forms that the board members signed? I said please provide the forms from whomever is in charge of purchasing and contracting. She went back and made copies of the forms filled out by the board members. When she handed them to me, she said she was not going to give me the principles forms because they are not in charge, nor, for that matter, neither is the board. I asked, how about the superintendent, would he be considered in charge? She said she would only give me the board members forms. There was no charge for the copies. I thanked her and left.

Top

CalAware Reaction (Terry Francke, General Counsel):


The district staff provided access to Form 700s for the school board members only - not the superintendent. It also required the auditor's name, affiliation and purpose for the request. As for the information sought in the written request, no determination letter or even an announcement of extension had been provided 25 days after the request.

Top