Californians Aware
HomeCalAwareSupportProgramsNewsResourcesStore
Mission Text LOGIN +
litigation
blog
sunscribe
Info for Citizens
Info for Public Officials
Info for Journalists
Info for Attorneys

Support CalAware Support CalAware Become a Member Volunteer Donate

Brought to you by

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player


UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS
» Legal Compliance Scoring
» Customer Service Scoring
» Auditor Narrative
» CalAware Reaction
» View Oral and Written Request Samples
» What We Asked for and Why

Legal Compliance

Deduct the following from 100 points :

Was the requester denied the ability to make the request? No (-0 points)
Explanation: When the agency refuses to receive the request or pass it along to the appropriate party.
Did the agency deny access to any of the Form 700s? Yes (-10 points)
Explanation: When the agency refuses to allow access to any of the completed Form 700s for any reason.
Was photo ID required? No (-0 points)
Explanation: When the agency requires the requester to produce photo ID as a condition of the access.
Was the requester's name required? No (-0 points)
Explanation: When the agency requires the requester to provide their name as a condition of the access.
Was the requester's affiliation required? No (-0 points)
Explanation: When the agency requires the requester to provide their affiliation as a condition of the access.
Was the requester required to state their purpose? Yes (-5 points)
Explanation: When the agency requires the requester to explain the reason they are making the request and/or what they will do with the materials produced as a condition of the access.
Was a written request required? No (-0 points)
Explanation:When the agency requires that requests be made in writing (refuse to acknowledge oral requests).
Were the Form 700s produced by the legally compliant deadline (within 48 after making the request)? (not applicable)
Was the requester only allowed to view (not copy) the Form 700s? No (-0 points)
Was the requester charged a fee to view the Form 700s? No (-0 points)
Was the copy fee for the Form 700s within the legally compliant maximum
(10¢ per page)?
No (-0 points)
Was the letter of determination received within 10 days (or 24 days, if a 14 day extension was requested)? Yes (-0 points)
Did the agency deny access to any of the items in the written request? No (-0 points)
Explanation: The score is reduced by 5 points for each item unjustifiably denied, up to -35 points.
Campus Police:
Was the requester denied the ability to make the request? No (-0 points)
Campus Police:
Did the agency deny access to the police log? No (-0 points)
Campus Police:
Was photo ID required? No (-0 points)
Campus Police:
Was the requester's name required? No (-0 points)
Campus Police:
Was the requester's affiliation required? No (-0 points)
Campus Police:
Was the requester required to state their purpose? No (-0 points)
Campus Police:
Was a written request required? No (-0 points)
Campus Police:
Was the requester only allowed to view (not copy) the police log? No (-0 points)
Campus Police:
Police Log Included:
Time of Incident Yes (-0 points)
Date of Incident Yes (-0 points)
Date of Incident Yes (-0 points)
Location of Incident Yes (-0 points)
Time of Report Yes (-0 points)
Nature of Incident Yes (-0 points)
Disposition of Complaint Yes (-0 points)
Total Points Deducted : 15
Final Score : 85
Grade : B
Top

Customer Service

Deduct the following from 100 points :

Was agency staff courteous? Yes (-0 points)
Explanation:When agency staff are polite and professional
Was agency staff helpful? No (-10 points)
Explanation:When agency staff try to help the requester succeed with his or her request.
Was the requester referred to another agency altogether? No (-0 points)
Explanation: When the agency refuses to fulfill the request, and instead sends the requester to another agency.
BONUS! Did the agency have any public records request guidelines (or policy) posted? No (+0 points)
Explanation: When the agency conspicuously posts procedural guidelines in its main lobby area to help the public navigate their agency when making public record requests (worth 10 extra credit points).
Total Points Deducted : 10
Final Score : 90
Grade : A-
Top

Auditor Narrative (auditor Sam Pearson):


UC Davis Chancellor's Office :

When I arrived at the Chancellor's Office, I spoke to two secretaries at the front desk. I explained that I wanted to request some public records, specifically the Form 700 and ethics training completion for the chancellor and vice chancellor. They became confused and did not know what these forms were or where they were available. They asked me why I wanted to look at the forms. They were unable to produce the documents since they were clearly not familiar with them. They told me that the documents were probably available on the school's website and that I should check there. I was unable to get a more specific recommendation, like what part of the website I should go to. I was unable to locate the documents online and have not received them. I called the office a day later to ask again but was unable to reach anyone even though it was regular business hours.

UC Davis Police Department :

The police department was very responsive and easy to deal with. I entered their waiting room and was helped promptly. When I explained that I was looking to view public records of recent incidents, the officer told me that the information was available on a clipboard behind me in the waiting room. Sure enough, there was a clipboard there that was prominently labeled as being the media crime log. It contained all necessary information that described recent incidents the police responded to. The officer I talked to explained that after a certain amount of time, older incidents were removed from the clipboard, but that amount of time was much longer than the 14 days I was looking for.

Top

CalAware Reaction (Terry Francke, General Counsel) :


UC Davis Chancellor's Office :

Secretaries in the chancellor's office had never heard of Form 700s, asked the auditor's purpose in requesting them, but offered no further help other than that they might be found on the university's website, which they are not. The forms were never produced. By contrast, an acknowledgement letter with respect to the written requests arrived fairly promptly, but with hedged reactions to the request for a number of records-indicating that information on employee discipline, plans for spending stimulus funds, athletic and arts scholarships awarded, and price markups for required textbooks and materials at the campus bookstore might be confidential. But other than this communication, no determination letter or even an announcement of extension had been provided 25 days after the request.

Top